National Nature Review Season: How to determine the meeting?

The national nature review is in full swi.

While waiting for the review, let's talk about the state of the revi.

The so-called meeting means that the Foundation Committee summarizes the corresponding scoring and ranking by the review system based on the results of the communication revi.

Projects are automatically graded according to the communication review opinio.

How to determine the meeting?

Usually, there will be 3-5 letter review experts for a book with a broad fa.

First, let's take a look at the scoring of the letter review, please pay attention to the screenshot below (the face is almost gree.

As can be seen from the screenshots, the comments of the letter are divided into two parts:

The first part is the comprehensive evaluation, that is, 3-5 letter comments in the email of the application result sent by the official to the applica.

The second part is the funding opinion, which also includes the opinion in the first part, but it is still given without fundi.

It can be seen that whether a book can be included in the conference mainly depends on comprehensive evaluation and funding opinio.

In the comments of each discipline office on the letter:

A, B, C, and D in the comprehensive evaluation part are assigned different scor.

Priority funding corresponds to 4 points in the funding comments section, 2 points for eligible funding, and no points for no fundi.

The final meeting score = comprehensive score + funding opinion = (A4+B3+2C+D1)/number of letter comments + (A4+B2)/number of letter comments, the full score is 8 poin.

Table 1 Standard scores for general and regional projects

Table 2 The standard score of the youth program

What does pass without special circumstances in the form mean?

Usually, the issue of integrity will be rejected by one vote; some applicants apply for different types of projects in the same year, such as youth and seniors or youth and regions at the same ti.

The above is the calculation standard of the meeting score value and the standard score of the meeti.

Second, what is the proportion of the meeting? Who are the experts?

What is the proportion of the meeting?

According to the national evaluation rules, before the evaluation, the Foundation Committee will hold a meeting to determine the number of funding for each discipli.

The following are the principles for submitting the Mianqingdi project (D07) of the Department of Environmental Geochemistry of the Ministry of Natural Geosciences and the proposed meeting in 202 It can be seen that whether the meeting will be specific or not will be related to the scientific attributes, average scores and funding opinions of the applicants of the departme.

Source: 2021 Environmental Earth Science Discipline Project Review and Final Results Analysis

In 2021, China Nature has funded about 45,000 projec.

If the ratio is 130%, only about 60,000 projects will enter the evaluation in 2020, and the remaining more than 210,000 projects will be eliminated in the letter evaluation sta.

Only when the book is in the meeting can it finally be fund.

Who are the review experts?

The role of the review experts is mainly to conduct a secondary review of the non-consensus items in the letter review, so as to select high-quality manuscrip.

Unlike letter review experts, conference review experts require a deep understanding and knowledge of the field, which also determines that they are mainly well-known professors and researche.

According to the past situation, after the conclusion of the National Nature Conference, the experts of the conference will also announce .

Taking the 2020 National Nature Conference as an example, there are about 3,000 reviewe.

The reviewers have the following characteristics:

In the projects of outstanding youth, group, outstanding youth, e.

, the evaluation experts are basically high-level scholars such as academicians and outstanding youth, and a very small part are outstanding youth and ordinary professors without hats;

　　In the Mianqingdi project, except for the Department of Mathematical and Physical Sciences and the Department of Management Science, each department has about 200-300 experts in Mianqingdi, and there are generally 30-40 experts in secondary disciplines;

　　Among the experts at the Mianqingdi Conference, there are not many academicians of the two academies, only more than ten peop.

The outstanding youth Changjiang and excellent youth winners account for a very high proportion, reaching 30-40%; in addition to these big cows with hats, there are also Some ordinary professors, these professors have generally obtained multiple general projects and other projects;

　　The work units of evaluation experts are mainly concentrated in well-known universities and large institutes, especially 985 universities and 211 universities, and experts from these universities account for the majority; there are also some non-renowned universities that have evaluation experts shortlisted, and the number of this part is very sma.

Most of the finalists are academic gurus with the title of academy lead.