-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
As the world's first fully human monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, daramazumab (Dara) has a unique dual mechanism of action, which can directly kill myeloma cells and activate immunity, which can bring long-lasting and deep relief
to multiple myeloma (MM) patients.
Dara has entered the national medical insurance directory
in 2021.
The Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Myeloma, the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Integrated Oncology (CACA), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), and the Mayo Guidelines all recommend Dara-based regimens for the treatment of treatment-specific
MM.
In order to help more and more hematologists better apply drugs in actual clinical practice, this micro-classroom specially invited Professor Hua Baolai from Beijing Shijitan Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University to share the clinical management
of Dara infusion reaction and blood transfusion interference.
In terms of mechanism, the infusion-related reactions (IRRs) observed during Dara treatment are unlikely to be associated with anaphylaxis, tumor lysis syndrome, or cytokine release1,2
.
Antibody drugs such as Dara are exogenous proteins that inevitably activate the body's autoimmune response and induce the production of anti-drug antibodies, thereby affecting their safety and efficacy3
.
However, no positive anti-Dara antibodies have been reported
in patients.
In terms of clinical manifestations, the IRR caused by Dara usually occurs in the lungs and gastrointestinal tract4, and the most common clinical manifestations include nasal congestion, cough, chills or vomiting, and severe IRR can manifest as bronchospasm, hypoxia, or dyspnea
.
Clinical studies have shown that the incidence of IRR is the highest in the first infusion at 35.
8%, and the incidence rate is significantly reduced during subsequent infusion, with a 1.
9% incidence in the second week of infusion and a cumulative incidence of 5.
4%
during subsequent infusion.
Less than 1% of patients developed a grade 3 or 4 infusion-related reaction at the second week or subsequent infusions5
.
Therefore, clinical practice needs to focus on patients with the first infusion of Dara, and it is recommended to start the drug infusion
on weekday mornings.
Antipyretics, antihistamines, and corticosteroids should be given 1 to 3 hours before each Dara infusion (Figure 1), and strict adherence to the prescribed infusion rate during infusion is effective in reducing the risk of IRR5
.
Figure 1.
Dera pre-infusion administration is recommended5
Patients are given 20 mg of methylprednisolone or an equivalent dose of intermediate/long-acting corticosteroids after Dara infusion to reduce the risk of
delayed IRR.
Post-infusion medication, including short- and long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids
, should be considered in patients with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
After the first four infusions, if the patient does not develop a major IRR, the above post-inhalation drugs
can be discontinued at the discretion of the physician.
In addition, antiviral prophylaxis should be considered to prevent shingles virus reactivation5
.
Patients with IRR of any severity should immediately discontinue Dara infusion and be given pharmacologic or supportive care
as needed.
After symptoms clear, the decision to continue the infusion depends on the severity of the IRR, and in most cases the infusion of Dara
can be continued.
When re-inducing Dara infusion after IRR is present, the infusion rate needs to be adjusted according to the severity of IRR occurrence (Figure 2)5
.
Figure 2.
After the IRR appears, restart the rate adjustment of the infusion of Dara5
Dara's interference with blood transfusion and the method of elimination are also practical problems
that may be encountered in clinical practice.
Dara is a humanized monoclonal antibody of IgG1κ 7 that binds to CD38 on the surface of red blood cells and interferes with transfusion compatibility testing, most commonly indirect anti-human globulin testing (IAT) such as antibody screening and crossmatching
.
Since Dara binds to CD38 molecules on the surface of red blood cells, accidental antibody agglutination of red blood cells can be caused after the addition of antiglobulin reagents6, but the expression of CD38 on the surface of red blood cells is low, and Dara's interference with blood transfusion is controllable
.
First of all, Dara does not interfere with routine ABO and Rh blood grouping
.
Secondly, although CD38 monoclonal antibody can cause slight hemolysis, resulting in a slight decrease in hemoglobin amount, it does not cause severe autologous hemolysis or hemolytic reactions
after allogeneic transfusion.
If urgent transfusion is required, uncrossmatched ABO/RhD-compatible RBC5
can be used according to local blood bank practice.
Common methods to eliminate Dara blood transfusion interference include dithiothreonyl a alcohol (DTT) treatment, dimercaptoethanol (2-Me) treatment, and coagulation amine treatment, and the mechanisms, advantages and disadvantages of each treatment method vary (Figure 3)5
.
Among them, DTT is the only globally proven method to overcome the compatibility of Vara interference transfusion7, which can eliminate false positives of IAT and solve Dara blood transfusion interference
.
Based on drug accessibility and clinical evidence, China's "Expert Consensus on the Interference of CD38 Monoclonal Antibody on Transfusion Compatibility Detection and Its Response Scheme" recommends the clinical use of coagulated amine method for antibody screening or cross-matching test, or the use of commercially available 2-Me application solution or homemade DTT working solution to remove the transfusion interference of CD38 monoclonal antibody6
.
Figure 3.
Common methods and advantages and disadvantages of eliminating Dara blood transfusion interference5
For patients treated with Vara with potential transfusion needs, the clinical management process recommended by expert consensus above should be referred to (Figure 4).
Prior to Dara treatment, the clinician takes a blood sample from the patient, sends it to the transfusion department for blood grouping, conducts antibody screening, and takes the patient's specimen.
After treatment with Dara, when blood transfusion is required, inform the transfusion specialist that DTT, dimercaptoethanol, or coagulated amine may be used to eliminate the effect of Dara on transfusion when performing transfusion compatibility testing6
.
Figure 4.
Clinical management process for patients treated with darramumab with potential transfusion needs6
summary
Dara IRR occurs mainly on the first infusion, with less than 1%
of patients experiencing a grade 3 or 4 infusion reaction in subsequent infusions.
Treatment with Dara requires prophylactic medication and control of the infusion rate as recommended to better reduce the risk of IRR
Dara can interfere with transfusion compatibility testing
.
Transfusion compatibility testing should be performed before starting Dara therapy; After Dara treatment, the effects of Dara on blood transfusion can be eliminated using DTT, coagulation, or dimercaptoethanol
references
1.
Voorhees P, et al.
(ASH) Annual Meeting, 2015; December 5-8: Orlando, Florida (abstract 1829).
2.
Daratumumab US Prescribing Information, last accessed April 2016.
3.
Wei Liang, et al.
Drug evaluation.
2014;(6):12-6.
4.
Donald C Moore, et al.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk.
2020 Oct; 20(10):e777-e781.
5.
Instructions for daratumumab injection.
2022-05-09.
6.
Mi Jianqing, et al.
Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion, 2021,34(4):327-334.
7.
Chapuy CI, et al.
Transfusion.
2016 Dec; 56(12):2964-2972.
EM-111895 Content Approved Date :10/02/2022
For the reference of medical and pharmaceutical professionals only, reproduction and dissemination are strictly prohibited
Poke "Read Original" to see more