-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
According to the Economic Times of India, the Indian government has decided not to impose a temporary safeguard duty on solar cell imports from China and Malaysia, rejecting a previous proposal
to impose a 70% tariff.
The recommendation was made by Indian Customs and the Central Fire Service to take immediate action in early 2018 to prevent further harm to the domestic solar industry, recommending a 200-day period to fulfil its duties
.
However, the Government Decision stated that the proposal was not binding and the Delhi High Court of India had dealt with a petition for temporary safeguard duty on the basis of this declaration
.
Anand Kumar, secretary of India's Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, confirmed the decision
not to levy taxes at this time.
According to the report, the court's ruling "does not preclude the applicant's right to challenge any adverse order in accordance with the law.
"
The so-called safeguard duty proposal comes from the Solar Manufacturers Association of India (ISMA), which represents five Indian PV manufacturers whose combined production capacity accounts for more than
half of India's domestic solar cell production capacity.
The petition against the safeguard proposal was filed by Acme Solar, arguing that such a measure would only weaken the solar cell industry
.
According to the Economic Times of India, the Indian government has decided not to impose a temporary safeguard duty on solar cell imports from China and Malaysia, rejecting a previous proposal
to impose a 70% tariff.
The recommendation was made by Indian Customs and the Central Fire Service to take immediate action in early 2018 to prevent further harm to the domestic solar industry, recommending a 200-day period to fulfil its duties
.
However, the Government Decision stated that the proposal was not binding and the Delhi High Court of India had dealt with a petition for temporary safeguard duty on the basis of this declaration
.
Anand Kumar, secretary of India's Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, confirmed the decision
not to levy taxes at this time.
According to the report, the court's ruling "does not preclude the applicant's right to challenge any adverse order in accordance with the law.
"
The so-called safeguard duty proposal comes from the Solar Manufacturers Association of India (ISMA), which represents five Indian PV manufacturers whose combined production capacity accounts for more than
half of India's domestic solar cell production capacity.
The petition against the safeguard proposal was filed by Acme Solar, arguing that such a measure would only weaken the solar cell industry
.
