-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
-
Cosmetic Ingredient
- Water Treatment Chemical
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
This article from the NEJM Journal Watch, Surgery vs.
Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Surgery vs.
Radiation Review by Allan S.
Brett, MD In an observational study, Radical prostatectomy is associated with lower 5-year mortality
.
Patients with high-risk but limited-scope prostate cancer often have a choice between surgery and radiation therapy, but randomized trials comparing outcomes in this patient population are lacking
.
In an observational study, researchers used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to analyze 24,000 patients with localized high- or very-high-risk prostate cancer (according to the Johns Hopkins classification method) outcomes of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy
.
We used propensity score matching to compare cohorts of surgical and radiotherapy patients who were similar in age, Gleason score, clinical stage, and prostate-specific antigen levels
.
At 5 years, prostate cancer-specific mortality was significantly lower in the surgery group than in the EBRT group (2.
3% vs.
4.
1%; P<0.
001)
.
These absolute differences were larger in the very high-risk prostate cancer subgroup (3.
5% vs.
6.
0%; P<0.
001) and smaller in the high-risk prostate cancer subgroup (0.
7% vs.
1.
2%; P=0.
22)
.
Comments In this study, the surgery group had a better mortality outcome than the radiotherapy group
.
Limitations of this analysis included potential residual confounders and lack of information on use of androgen deprivation therapy, details of radiation regimen, and complications and side effects
.
However, due to the current lack of randomized trials, these results serve as background information to guide treatment decisions in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer
.
Reviewed article Chierigo F et al.
Survival after radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer.
J Urol 2022 Feb; 207:375.
(https://doi.
org/10.
1097/JU.
0000000000002250 ) Related readings NEJM Journal Watch NEJM Journal Watch (NEJM Journal Watch) is published by the NEJM Group.
It invites internationally renowned doctors to comment on important papers in the medical field and helps doctors understand and apply the latest developments
.
"NEJM Frontiers of Medicine" translates several articles every week, publishes them on the app and official website, and selects 2-3 articles and publishes them on WeChat
.
Copyright Information This article was translated, written or commissioned by the NEJM Frontiers in Medicine, jointly created by Jiahui Medical Research and Education Group (J-Med) and The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM)
.
The full text of the Chinese translation and the included figures are exclusively authorized by the NEJM Group
.
If you want to reprint, please leave a message or contact nejmqianyan@nejmqianyan.
cn
.
Unauthorized translation is an infringement, and the copyright owner reserves the right to pursue legal responsibility
.
Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Surgery vs.
Radiation Review by Allan S.
Brett, MD In an observational study, Radical prostatectomy is associated with lower 5-year mortality
.
Patients with high-risk but limited-scope prostate cancer often have a choice between surgery and radiation therapy, but randomized trials comparing outcomes in this patient population are lacking
.
In an observational study, researchers used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to analyze 24,000 patients with localized high- or very-high-risk prostate cancer (according to the Johns Hopkins classification method) outcomes of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy
.
We used propensity score matching to compare cohorts of surgical and radiotherapy patients who were similar in age, Gleason score, clinical stage, and prostate-specific antigen levels
.
At 5 years, prostate cancer-specific mortality was significantly lower in the surgery group than in the EBRT group (2.
3% vs.
4.
1%; P<0.
001)
.
These absolute differences were larger in the very high-risk prostate cancer subgroup (3.
5% vs.
6.
0%; P<0.
001) and smaller in the high-risk prostate cancer subgroup (0.
7% vs.
1.
2%; P=0.
22)
.
Comments In this study, the surgery group had a better mortality outcome than the radiotherapy group
.
Limitations of this analysis included potential residual confounders and lack of information on use of androgen deprivation therapy, details of radiation regimen, and complications and side effects
.
However, due to the current lack of randomized trials, these results serve as background information to guide treatment decisions in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer
.
Reviewed article Chierigo F et al.
Survival after radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer.
J Urol 2022 Feb; 207:375.
(https://doi.
org/10.
1097/JU.
0000000000002250 ) Related readings NEJM Journal Watch NEJM Journal Watch (NEJM Journal Watch) is published by the NEJM Group.
It invites internationally renowned doctors to comment on important papers in the medical field and helps doctors understand and apply the latest developments
.
"NEJM Frontiers of Medicine" translates several articles every week, publishes them on the app and official website, and selects 2-3 articles and publishes them on WeChat
.
Copyright Information This article was translated, written or commissioned by the NEJM Frontiers in Medicine, jointly created by Jiahui Medical Research and Education Group (J-Med) and The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM)
.
The full text of the Chinese translation and the included figures are exclusively authorized by the NEJM Group
.
If you want to reprint, please leave a message or contact nejmqianyan@nejmqianyan.
cn
.
Unauthorized translation is an infringement, and the copyright owner reserves the right to pursue legal responsibility
.