 Home > Chemicals Industry > China Chemical > Four national standards, including the General Principles for the Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Research Projects, were officially released

Four national standards, including the General Principles for the Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Research Projects, were officially released

 Last Update: 2023-01-05
 Source: Internet
 Author: User

Tags

technology journal

major basic protein

Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

Recently, the State Administration for Market Regulation (Standards Committee) approved the release of a new version of the National Standard for the Evaluation of Science and Technology Research Projects (GB/T 22900-2022), as well as the Implementation Guide for the Evaluation of Science and Technology Research Projects Basic Research Projects (GB/T 41619-2022), the Implementation Guidelines for the Evaluation of Science and Technology Research Projects Applied Research Projects (GB/T 41620-2022) and the Implementation Guidelines for the Evaluation of Science and Technology Research Projects The development and research project (GB/T 41621-2022) has a total of four recommended national standards, which provide a set of general framework and classification evaluation methods
for scientific research project evaluation.
This series of standards was proposed by the Ministry of Science and Technology, coordinated by the National Science and Technology Evaluation Standardization Technical Committee (SAC/TC580), and jointly drafted
by the China Institute of Standardization, the Institute of Science and Technology Strategy Consulting of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Zhongguancun Ju Value-added Science and Technology Evaluation Institute, and the Science and Technology Evaluation Center of the Ministry of Science and Technology.

In recent years, under the strong leadership of the Party Central Committee and the joint efforts of the national scientific and technological circles and all sectors of society, China's scientific and technological strength is moving from quantitative accumulation to qualitative leap, from point breakthrough to systematic capability improvement, and scientific and technological innovation has made new historic achievements
.
At the same time, the integration of scientific and technological innovation resources is not enough, the scientific and technological evaluation system does not meet the requirements of scientific and technological development, and the scientific and technological ecology needs to be further improved, and other problems also need to be paid attention to and solved
.

The evaluation of scientific research projects is centered on the target requirements of scientific research projects, and evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of
the project's cost, technical approach, progress, effect and other requirements.
Relevant departments set performance targets under the framework of specific systems, use scientific and reasonable performance evaluation indicators, standards and methods, make objective and fair evaluations of the efficiency, effectiveness and management standardization of scientific research projects, and apply the evaluation results to management improvement and project establishment reference
.

The series of standards released this time is an important measure
to improve the scientific and technological innovation system and accelerate the transformation and application of scientific and technological innovation achievements.
Compared with the 2009 version of the national standard, the revision adds evaluation principles, classification and evaluation focus of scientific research projects, evaluation links and content, and modifies evaluation methods and procedures
。 On the basis of GB/T 22900, the three standards of GB/T 41619, GB/T 41620 and GB/T 41621 respectively put forward the specific requirements for the evaluation of three types of scientific research projects: basic research, applied research and development research, and provide operational guidelines
for the evaluation of scientific research projects in a scientific and standardized manner.

This series of standards divides the evaluation activities of scientific research projects into four types: project evaluation, mid-term evaluation, acceptance evaluation and follow-up evaluation, and gives reference evaluation content
according to the characteristics of various activities.
Among them, the evaluation of basic research projects emphasizes originality, theory and experimentation, the evaluation of applied research projects emphasizes innovation, frontier and application, and the evaluation of development research projects emphasizes innovation, promotion and sustainability
.
This series of standards clarifies the evaluation process of scientific research projects, gives the evaluation methods that can be used for different evaluation needs, including peer review method, technical report method, multi-dimensional index evaluation method, etc.
, and introduces each method in the appendix, and focuses on the technical readiness level and its expansion and application
.

The issuance and implementation of this series of standards will help to implement the reform spirit of "three evaluations" of projects, talents and institutions, further improve the evaluation mechanism of scientific research projects, optimize project management and resource allocation, and improve project implementation performance, thereby improving the overall efficiency of
China's science and technology innovation system.

Original: Four national standards, including the General Principles for the Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Research Projects, were officially released

This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.