Expert advice: don't let the "hollow core" incident subvert the scientific instrument industry

In the past few days, the US sanctions against ZTE have been discussed in all dimensions.
ZTE’s own press conference said that the United States was irresponsible, some experts and scholars pointed out China’s basic research issues, and others said that China’s chip level is already very high.
, Just the last layer of window paper
.

In any case, the ZTE chip incident is a big reminder to our country, but I hope that this reminder is not limited to chips, but from this to the other, discussing the development of the entire cutting-edge technology
.

Therefore, it is hoped that there will be a systematic improvement project, rather than the headaches, the feet hurt the feet, so that there will never be an overall view of Chinese medicine, and it is impossible to surpass the United States
.

In the chip incident, many people mentioned basic research and preliminary research
.

In 2016, China published 426,000 papers in Elsevier's Scopus database, accounting for 18.
6% of the world’s total, which is basically the same as the status of China’s population in the world, while the United States published 409,000 papers.
According to the situation in the past ten years, China has been growing.
The United States is declining
.

　　It can be seen that China’s basic scientific research level is growing rapidly, but why China is still lagging behind in many technical fields? On the one hand, it is related to our weak foundation, but the impact of the evaluation mechanism, that is, the guidance mechanism, is also very important
.

　　At present, in China, there is too much emphasis on papers.
For example, there are basic projects in colleges and universities.
As long as you have published papers, you can support them.
As long as you have published enough papers, you can conclude the topic, whether you are creative or not.
No one cares about what work has been done
.

　　For another example, the ESI emphasized on many occasions in China is actually the global ranking of the total number of citations of the paper.
For example, in 2014, there were about 720 ESI in the global materials discipline, 60 in the mainland, and in January 2018, it increased to 813 in the world.
, The mainland has increased to 117.
In just 4 years, the number of mainland colleges and universities shortlisted has doubled, especially in the top one-thousandth, reaching 23, accounting for 28% of the world’s total.
In 2014, there were only 9 , Accounting for 12.
5% ​​of the world
.

　　Therefore, it can be predicted that by 2030, according to the current emphasis and double-class indicator system, mainland universities will reach the level of 40% or even 50% in ESI, which means they will occupy an absolute dominant position
.

　　In just four years, China's development is terrible.
No matter which opponent will feel terrible, does the opponent feel terrible?

　　I have traveled to several foreign universities, whether Chinese or foreigners, and asked about ESI.
It seems that no one knows what ESI is? The essence is a ranking.
I don’t know why I am afraid of being held in the hands of the Chinese, and in my mouth.
Afraid of change, colleges and universities mention ESI all day long, and they also use it as a double-class one
.

　　However, what are the data of scientific research papers of Chinese universities and colleges, especially what instruments are used to measure it
.

　　The author looked at the equipment of an analysis center of a university.
The total value is more than 60 million yuan.
No matter it is scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffractometer, transmission electron microscope, X-ray fluorescence, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, none of them are made in China
.

　　It is possible that the major universities are similar, especially the double first-class construction universities.
It is not bad for money.
Basically, the analytical instruments are all foreign.
There are even some equipment tenders, which are clearly proposed and domestic companies are not accepted
.

　　Regarding scientific research instruments, as early as April 23, 2009, Vice Minister Liu Yanhua of the Ministry of Science and Technology said at a symposium:

　　"The Chinese people's boom in buying scientific research equipment does not know how many foreign companies have been saved
.

　　"Due to the high dependence of scientific research instruments on external sources, China's scientific research is seriously'hollowed'
.

　　"Sometimes when I visit the laboratory, everyone is accustomed to introducing that this equipment is made in Germany, this one is made in the United States, and that one is made in Sweden.
They are all the best
.

　　"If developed countries block China, we will not be able to conduct research
.

　　Sure enough, today the United States banned the export of chips to ZTE.
Tomorrow, the West will announce that the maintenance of Chinese instruments will be stopped.
Whether China's scientific research will immediately fall down and cannot be tested
.

　　If one day, Eiswell and Springer announce that from now on, they will not accept Chinese manuscripts, or charge a publication fee of US$2,000 per Chinese manuscript, whether Chinese scholars will immediately not know where to publish their papers
.

　　If one day, SCI refuses to include papers from Chinese journals, the Chinese will not know what to do with the journal
.

　　If one day, on the basis of ESI, the West creates a new ranking system.
For example, if the overall ranking is no longer carried out, and the ESIP of the average ranking is carried out, will the Chinese start to speculate on the average ranking again, that is, whether it is SCI, ESI is still the standard of the West, and the Chinese are all chasing it.
When you are about to catch up, the West changes its standard.
The Chinese find that it is still far behind.
Does such pursuit make sense!

　　It seems that none of this will happen.
For example, chips are sold to us by the Americans to make money.
You don't make money if you leave it.
You fool, but it just doesn't sell.
Then the above thing might happen that day!!!

　　After thinking about it, I am scared, so I must respond to the call of the central government to do scientific research on the land of China, publish the results on the land of China, and formulate Chinese standards.
You must not be led by the nose
.

　　Because China is not a small country with a wealth of wealth and a population of tens of thousands in the West
.

　　Otherwise, it was not to change lanes and overtake, but someone else changed lanes.

　　Go China!

This article comes from the instrument trading network