echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Blood System > Efficacy of azacitidine combined with pevonedistat in high-risk MDS/CMML and low-blast AML patients

    Efficacy of azacitidine combined with pevonedistat in high-risk MDS/CMML and low-blast AML patients

    • Last Update: 2022-10-20
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com



    Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are myelotumors
    with common mutated genes and biological clinical features.
    They are characterized by cytopenia, progressive bone marrow failure, transfusion dependence, and low
    cure rates.
    Patients with AML with high-risk MDS/CMML and bone marrow blasts accounting for 20% to 30% are usually older, with a median age of 70 to 75 years at diagnosis, and often have comorbidities
    .
    As a result, only a minority of patients receive cure-intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Most patients received less intensity, noncurative chemotherapy, mainly demethylating drugs, including azacitidine and decitabine
    .
    Therefore, the therapy of the above patients needs to be further explored and improved
    .


    NEDD8 activators are involved in maintaining protein homeostasis and are essential components
    for protein ubiquitination and degradation.
    Pevonedistat is a selective inhibitor of NEDD8-activated enzymes that inhibits the degradation of proteins that interfere with DNA repair, cell cycle, and cell survival pathways, thereby disrupting protein homeostasis and leading to cancer cell death
    。 In a "proof-of-concept" randomized phase 2 clinical trial (NCT02610777), pevonedistat plus azacitidine showed superior efficacy compared with azacittidine monotherapy in high-risk MDS and 20%-30% of AML patients with blasts, with a complete response (CR) rate of nearly 2-fold, a duration of response approximately 3-fold, and improved event-free survival (EFS)
    in high-risk MDS patients.
    In terms of safety, pevonedistat combined with azacitidine was comparable to single-agent azacitidine, and the rate of myelosuppression did not increase
    .
    Based on this, some investigators report the results of the PANTHER clinical trial (NCT03268954), which compared the monotherapy azacitidine and evaluated the efficacy and safety
    of pevonedistostat combined with azacitidine in newly diagnosed high-risk MDS/CMML and 20%-30% of myeloid blasts in AML.

    Research methods

    The PANTHER trial is a randomized phase 3 clinical trial
    worldwide.
    Study inclusion criteria: age 18 years and older; Morphologically confirmed high-risk MDS, nonproliferative CMML (white blood cell count < 13,000/uL), or bone marrow blasts account for 20% to 30% of AML<b11>.
    Study exclusion criteria: eligible for intensive chemotherapy and/or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Previous treatment
    with chemotherapy or other antineoplastic drugs including decitabine and azacitidine.


    Included patients were randomized 1:1 to be assigned to pevonedistat plus azacitidine (combination) and single-agent azacitidine (monotherapy).

    The combined group received 20 mg/m2 of pevonedistat intravenously on days 1, 3 and 5 and intravenously or subcutaneously with azacitidine 75 mg/m2
    on days 1-5, 8 and 9.
    The monotherapy group received only azacitidine
    in a 28-day treatment cycle.
    The primary endpoint was EFS
    .
    The key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

    Other secondary endpoints included time to AML in patients with high-risk MDS/CMML; remission rate and duration of remission; Proportion and duration of patients independent of red blood cell and platelet transfusion; Security
    .

    Research results

    Baseline characteristics of the patient

    A total of 454 patients and 324 patients with high-risk MDS were included in the study (161 patients in the combined group; 163 patients in the monotherapy group), 103 patients with AML with 20%-30% blast cells (50 patients in the combined group; 53 patients in the monotherapy group) and 27 patients with high-risk CMML (16 in the combined group; 11 cases in the single-drug group).


    Demographic and disease baseline characteristics were balanced
    between groups.
    Among patients with high-risk MDS, the median age in the combined group was 73 years and the monotherapy group was 74 years, with 58% and 63%
    of men, respectively.
    Among patients with high-risk MDS with mutation information (n=270), the distribution of adverse prognostic factors and high-frequency mutant genes was also balanced between the combination group (n=135) and the monotherapy group (n=135), with the most common mutated genes being ASXL1 (41% vs.
    39%), RUNX1 (26% vs.
    33%), SRFS2 (27% vs.
    21%), STAG2 (19% vs.
    21%), TET2 (30% vs26%), and TP53 (29% vs26%)
    。 In patients with AML with blasts accounting for 20% to 30%, the incidence of secondary disease (36% vs.
    51%), high risk of ELN risk stratification (60% vs.
    70%), and ECOG PS score of 2 (14% vs.
    25%) were lower
    in the combination group compared with the monotherapy group.
    The specific baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1
    .


    Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 454 patients included


    Effectiveness analysis and safety analysis

    In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, median follow-up was 26.
    2 months in the combined group and 25.
    7 months in the monotherapy group, and median EFS in the combination group was 17.
    7 months and 15.
    7 months in the monotherapy group (HR, 0.
    968; 95% CI, 0.
    757-1.
    238; P = 0.
    557); In the combination and monotherapy groups, 97 and 94 patients died, and 38 and 32 patients underwent AML transformation, respectively; median OS was 20.
    3 months in the combined group and 16.
    8 months in the monotherapy group (HR, 0.
    881; 95% CI, 0.
    697-1.
    115; P = 0.
    181).

    In the cohort of patients with high-risk MDS, median EFS was 19.
    2 months in the combination group and 15.
    6 months in the monotherapy group (HR, 0.
    887; 95% CI, 0.
    659-1.
    193; P = 0.
    431); In the combination and monotherapy groups, 55 and 57 patients died, and 37 and 31 patients underwent AML transformation
    , respectively.
    Compared with the ITT population, median OS was longer in the combination group at 21.
    6 months and 17.
    5 months in the monotherapy group (HR, 0.
    785; 95% CI, 0.
    593-1.
    039; P = 0.
    092)
    in patients with high-risk MDS.
    The KM curves of EFS and OS in patients with high-risk MDS are shown in Figure 1
    .
    In patients with AML with 20% to 30% of bone marrow blasts, median OS was 14.
    5 and 14.
    7 months, respectively, in the combination and monotherapy groups, with no significant difference (HR, 1.
    107; 95% CI, 0.
    694 to 1.
    765; P = 0.
    664).

    There was also no significant difference
    in EFS and OS between the combination and monotherapy groups in the cohort of high-risk CMML patients.
    When the number of treatment cycles was included in the analysis, the median OS in the combination and monotherapy groups was 23.
    8 months and 20.
    6 months, respectively, in the cohort of high-risk MDS patients with > three treatment cycles (HR, 0.
    714; 95% CI, 0.
    515-0.
    990; P = 0.
    021); In the cohort of high-risk MDS patients with > 6 treatment cycles, median OS was 27.
    1 and 22.
    5 months in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (HR, 0.
    626; 95% CI, 0.
    427-0.
    917; P=0.
    008).


    For the safety analysis results, no new safety events were found in the study, and the dose of azacitidine was maintained at a certain level
    .
    In the overall patient cohort, the most common grade 3 and above adverse events in combination and monotherapy groups were anaemia (33% and 34%), neutropenia (31% and 33%), and thrombocytopenia (30% and 30%)
    .


    Fig.
    1 KM curves of EFS and OS in patients with high-risk MDS

    Conclusion of the study

    Overall, patients with AML with high-risk CMML and bone marrow blasts of 20% to 30% did not benefit significantly from azacitidine plus pevonedistat compared with azacitidine alone, but OS improvement occurred in patients with high-risk MDS who received the combination regimen, particularly in high-risk MDS patients
    who received > 3 treatment cycles.


    References: Adès L, Girshova L, Doronin VA, et al.
    Pevonedistat plus azacitidine vs azacitidine alone in higher-risk MDS/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or low-blast-percentage AML.
    Blood Adv.
    2022 Sep 13; 6(17):5132-5145.
    doi: 10.
    1182/bloodadvances.
    2022007334.
    PMID: 35728048.


    Reviewed by Quinta

    Typesetting: Quinta

    Execution: moly



    Poke "Read Original" to see more

    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.