echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Study of Nervous System > Comparison of three treatment options for diabetic neuropathy pain

    Comparison of three treatment options for diabetic neuropathy pain

    • Last Update: 2022-10-26
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    This article is from NEJM Journal Watch


    Comparing Treatment Options for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

    Comparison of different treatment options for diabetic neuropathy pain


    Reviewed by Bruce Soloway, MD


    All three regimens, including combination therapy when monotherapy fails, are equally effective
    .


    For patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain, most guidelines recommend initial treatment with amitriptyline, duloxetine, pregabalin, or gabapentin; However, these agents often do not provide complete symptom relief, and head-to-head comparisons are rare
    for different regimens.
    Clinicians sometimes add a second agent when monotherapy does not respond to patients, but this strategy has not been evaluated
    in high-quality studies.

    The investigators developed three 16-week regimens, each of which first adjusted the dose of the first drug to the maximum tolerated dose during the 6-week period, and then added a second drug during the second 10 weeks if the first drug did not respond well to relieve the condition.

    The three schemes are: (1) amitriptyline plus pregabalin
    .
    (2) Duloxetine plus pregabalin
    .
    (3) Pregabalin plus amitriptyline
    .
    In this trial, a cross-over design of 130 people with diabetic neuropathy pain (mean duration of illness, 5 years) were randomised, first treated with one of the three regimens for 16 weeks, followed by one week of wash-out period, started with one of the other two regimens for 16 weeks, and finally treated with a third regimen for 16 weeks
    .
    Three scenarios result in 6 possible sequences
    .

    The mean pain intensity of patients decreased from 6.
    6 at baseline (10-component scale) to 3.
    3 in the last week of each regimen, with no significant difference
    between the three regimens at any time point.
    Approximately 35% of patients experienced adequate pain relief with monotherapy, and another 15% had adequate pain relief
    with the addition of a second agent.

    comments

    The study supports the addition of a second agent
    when monotherapy fails to adequately relieve diabetic neuropathy pain.
    It is also suggested that commonly used drugs for the disease are equally effective
    in monotherapy or combination therapy.
    But there are three points worth mentioning
    .
    First, known side effects of these drugs were common in the trial (e.
    g.
    , amitriptyline caused dry mouth and sedation, pregabalin caused dizziness, and duloxetine caused nausea).

    Second, the trial did not have a placebo group
    .
    Third, the investigators did not explore another reasonable strategy, sequential monotherapy (switching from one drug to another and then using combination therapy when ineffective).


    Articles that are commented on

    Tesfaye S et al.
    Comparison of amitriptyline supplemented with pregabalin, pregabalin supplemented with amitriptyline, and duloxetine supplemented with pregabalin for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (OPTION-DM): A multicentre, double-blind, randomised crossover trial.
    Lancet 2022 Aug 27; 400:680.
    (https://doi.
    org/10.
    1016/S0140-6736(22)01472-6)


    NEJM Journal Collection

    Published by NEJM Group, NEJM Journal Watch invites internationally renowned doctors to review important papers in the medical field to help doctors understand and apply the latest developments
    .
    NEJM Medical Frontiers is translated several times a week, published on the app and official website, and selected 2-3 articles are published
    on WeChat.


    Copyright Information This article is translated, written or commissioned
    by Jiahui Medical Research and Education Group (J-Med) and the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).
    The full Chinese translation and the figures contained therein are exclusively licensed
    by NEJM Group.
    If you need to reprint, please leave a message or contact nejmqianyan@nejmqianyan.
    cn
    .
    Unauthorized translation is an infringement and the copyright owner reserves the right to
    pursue legal responsibility.


    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.