echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Immunology News > ARD: What Causes Inconsistency in Outcome Measurements in SLE Clinical Trials?

    ARD: What Causes Inconsistency in Outcome Measurements in SLE Clinical Trials?

    • Last Update: 2022-08-16
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    OBJECTIVE : In the anifrolumab (type I interferon receptor monoclonal antibody) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) trial program, there is a trial (TULIP-1) in which the BILAG - based Comprehensive Lupus Assessment (BICLA) anifrolumab response was superior to placebo treatment , but the SLE response index (SRI(4)) treatment did not differ significant.

    Researchers from AstraZeneca investigated the degree of concordance between BICLA and SRI(4) in the anifrolumab trial to better understand the drivers of discordant results in the SLE tria.

    Objectives : In the anifrolumab (type I interferon receptor monoclonal antibody) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) trial program, there is a trial (TULIP-1) in which the BILAG - based comprehensive lupus assessment (BICLA) anifrolumab response was superior to Placebo, but the SLE Response Index (SRI(4)) treatment difference was not significa.

    Researchers from AstraZeneca investigated the degree of concordance between BICLA and SRI(4) in the anifrolumab trial to better understand the drivers of discordant results in the SLE tria.

    METHODS : TULIP-1 , TULIP-2 (all Phase 3 ) and MUSE (Phase 2b ) were randomized, 52 - week trials of intravenous anifrolumab ( 300 mg every 4 weeks for 48 weeks; TULIP-1/TULIP- 2 : n=180 ; MUSE : n=99 ) or placebo ( TULIP-1 : n=184 , TULIP-2 : n=182 ; MUSE : n=102 .

    Week 52 BICLA and SRI(4) outcomes were assessed for each patien.

    METHODS : TULIP-1 , TULIP - 2 (all Phase 3 ) and MUSE (Phase 2b ) were randomized, 52 - week trials of intravenous anifrolumab ( 300 mg every 4 weeks for 48 weeks; TULIP-1/TULIP -2 : n=180 ; MUSE : n=99 ) or placebo ( TULIP-1 : n=184 , TULIP-2 : n=182 ; MUSE : n=102 .

    Week 52 BICLA and SRI(4) outcomes were assessed for each patien.

    RESULTS : The majority of patients (78% – 85%) had consistent BICLA and SRI(4) results ( Cohen's Kappa 6 – 7 , nominal p<001.

    Dual BICLA/SRI(4) response rates were superior to placebo in TULIP-1 , TULIP-2 and MUSE (all nominal p ≤ 004 .

    A discordant subgroup of TULIP-1 BICLA non-responders /SRI(4) responders was identified ( 40/364 , 11% of the TULIP-1 population ), with more patients receiving placebo ( n=28 ) than anifrolumab ( n=12.

    In this subgroup, patients who received placebo had lower baseline disease activity, joint counts, and glucocorticoid reduction rates, and more patients who received placebo had an arthritic response than patients who received anifroluma.

    Results Results : The majority of patients (78% – 85%) had consistent BICLA and SRI(4) results ( Cohen's Kappa 6 – 7 , nominal p<001.

    Dual BICLA/SRI(4) response rates were superior to placebo in TULIP-1 , TULIP-2 and MUSE (all nominal p ≤ 004 .

    A discordant subgroup of TULIP-1 BICLA non-responders /SRI(4) responders was identified ( 40/364 , 11% of the TULIP-1 population ), with more patients receiving placebo ( n=28 ) than anifrolumab ( n=12

    In this subgroup, patients who received placebo had lower baseline disease activity, joint counts, and glucocorticoid reduction rates, and more patients who received placebo had an arthritic response than patients who received anifroluma.

    CONCLUSIONS : Across all trials, the majority of patients had consistent BICLA/SRI(4) results, with dual BICLA/SRI(4) responses favoring anifrolum.


    A subgroup of BICLA non-responders /SRI(4) responders was identified in which an imbalance of key factors contributing to BICLA/SRI(4) discordance (disease activity, glucocorticoid tapering) disproportionately favors TULIP-1 placebo dose gro.


    CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS : Across all trials, the majority of patients had consistent BICLA/SRI(4) results, with dual BICLA/SRI(4) responses favoring anifrolum.


    Bruce IN, Furie RA, Morand EF , et a.
    Concordance and discordance in SLE clinical trial outcome measures: analysis of three anifrolumab phase 2/3 tria.
    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases2022;81 : 962-96 , et al Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases: Leave a message here
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.