echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Study of Nervous System > Alzheimer & Demetia: How to better identify the mood disorders of patients with Alzheimer's disease?

    Alzheimer & Demetia: How to better identify the mood disorders of patients with Alzheimer's disease?

    • Last Update: 2021-06-29
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    In the RCT for anxiety and affective disorders of Alzheimer's disease (Alzheimer's disease, AD ) patients , two methods are used to assess treatment response: 1 ) Overall score based on the judgment of experienced clinicians; and (2) reflection Severity and / or frequency score of the scale items of the anxiety syndrome components .
    Examples of the latter method include the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), which are the most widely used measures in the trial .

    In the RCT for anxiety and affective disorders of Alzheimer's disease (Alzheimer's disease, AD ) patients , two methods are used to assess treatment response: 1 ) Overall score based on the judgment of experienced clinicians; and (2) reflection Severity and / or frequency score of the scale items of the anxiety syndrome components .


    Examples of the latter method include examples of the latter method include the Cohen-Mansfield Irritability Scale (CMAI) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), which are the most widely used measures in the trial .
    The Cohen-Mansfield Irritability Scale (CMAI) and the Neuropsychiatric Disorder Scale (NPI) are the most widely used measures in the trial .

    However, the disadvantage of this method is that the score derived entirely from the opinions of the caregiver can lead to various deviations
    .


    The NPI- Clinician ( NPI-C ) version was developed to address this limitation; however, so far, there is no gold standard score for these trials


    However, the disadvantage of this method is that the score derived entirely from the opinions of the caregiver can lead to various deviations


    In 2015 , the International Psychiatric Association of Geriatrics ( IPA ) published temporary standards for anxiety in cognitive disorders to promote research in this field
    .


    In 2018 , the European Union - North American Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trial ( EU-US CTAD ) Anxiety Problem Working Group encouraged evidence-based, using existing data sets and items in the existing scale to develop an anxiety standard for IPA Single rating scale


    In 2015 , the International Psychiatric Association of Geriatrics ( IPA ) published temporary standards for anxiety in cognitive disorders to promote research in this field


    In response to the EU - U.


    In a modified Delphi process, the Cohen-Mansfield Anxiety Inventory ( CMAI ) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Clinician ( NPI-C ) items were mapped to the IPA anxiety domain, resulting in new tools, CMAI-IPA and NPI -C-IPA
    .


    Validation in the Agitation and Aggression AD cohort ( A3C ) evaluated the smallest clinically important differences ( MCIDs ), change sensitivity, and predictive validity


    In a modified Delphi process, the Cohen-Mansfield Anxiety Inventory ( CMAI ) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Clinician ( NPI-C ) items were mapped to the IPA anxiety domain, resulting in new tools, CMAI-IPA and NPI -C-IPA


    1 month, 31 patients (13.


    mADCS-CGIC1-2 and ≥3 and Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Scale (CMAI), Neuropsychiatric Scale Clinician Score (NPI-C)-Agitation + Depression (A+A), CMAI-International Geriatric Association (IPA) And NPI-C-IPA in 1 month and 3 months

    mADCS-CGIC1-2 and ≥3 and Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Scale (CMAI), Neuropsychiatric Scale Clinician Score (NPI-C)-Agitation + Depression (A+A), CMAI-International Geriatric Association (IPA) And NPI-C-IPA in 1 month and 3 months

    At 3 months, 44 patients (20.
    5%) had a great or very great improvement with mADCS-CGIC
    .


    The average score of CMAI is 52.


    At 3 months, 44 patients (20.


    Based on five indexes, sensitivity to changes in CMAI, NPI-C-anxiety + attack (A+A), CMAI-IPA, NPI-C-IPA between M0 and M3 and between M0 and M1

    Based on five indexes, sensitivity to changes in CMAI, NPI-C-anxiety + attack (A+A), CMAI-IPA, NPI-C-IPA between M0 and M3 and between M0 and M1

    The MCID of CMAI is -17 ( OR=14.
    9 , 95% CI=6.
    8-32.
    6 ); CMAI-IPA is -5 ( OR=9.
    3 , 95%CI=4.
    0-21.
    2 ); NPI-C-A+A is -3 ( OR=11.
    9 , 95%CI=4.
    1-34.
    8 ); NPI-C-IPA at 3 months is -5 ( OR=7.
    8 , 95%CI=3.
    4-17.
    9 ) .

    The MCID of CMAI is -17 ( OR=14.


    9 , 95% CI=6.
    8-32.
    6 ); CMAI-IPA is -5 ( OR=9.
    3 , 95%CI=4.
    0-21.
    2 ); NPI-C-A+A is -3 ( OR=11.
    9 , 95%CI=4.
    1-34.
    8 ); NPI-C-IPA at 3 months is -5 ( OR=7.
    8 , 95%CI=3.
    4-17.
    9 ) .

    The area under the curve shows that no scale can better predict the clinician’s overall score
    .
    All indicators are highly sensitive to changes
    .

    The area under the curve shows that no scale can better predict the clinician’s overall score
    .
    All indicators are highly sensitive to changes
    .
    The area under the curve shows that no scale can better predict the clinician’s overall score
    .
    All indicators are highly sensitive to changes
    .

    Analysis of internal consistency and reliability shows that NPI-C-IPA is more accurate than CMAI-IPA, and can be used for the inclusion of AD anxiety clinical trials and the response to intervention
    .

    Analysis of internal consistency and reliability shows that NPI-C-IPA is more accurate than CMAI-IPA, and can be used for the inclusion of AD anxiety clinical trials and the response to intervention
    .
    Analysis of internal consistency and reliability shows that NPI-C-IPA is more accurate than CMAI-IPA, and can be used for the inclusion of AD anxiety clinical trials and the response to intervention
    .

     

     

    references:

    references:

    Agitation in Alzheimer's disease: Novel outcome measures reflecting the International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) agitation criteria.
    https://doi.
    org/10.
    1002/alz.
    12335

    Agitation in Alzheimer's disease: Novel outcome measures reflecting the International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) agitation criteria.
    https://doi.
    org/10.
    1002/alz.
    12335 Agitation in Alzheimer's disease: Novel outcome measures reflecting the International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) agitation criteria .
    in this message
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.