10 victims of clenbuterol filed a claim with Suzhou meat joint factory

Introduction: Recently, it was learned from the relevant departments of Suzhou that there are 10 victims of clenbuterol in Suzhou who claim for compensation from Suzhou meat complex According to the statistics of relevant departments, more than 20 people were injured in the "Clenbuterol poisoning" incident more than two months ago Xiao Rong, one of the victims, complained to the Suzhou Consumer Association on March 15 Mr Xiao believes that although the pig liver that directly causes poisoning was bought at a meat stall in a vegetable farm in Suzhou, when the stall owner faced the camera of the TV station and the relevant law enforcement officers of the health department, he had already admitted that the source of his pig liver was Suzhou meat joint factory Therefore, the factory's lax control of pork, viscera and other products led to the toxic pig liver entering the market and harming the consumers Physical and mental health, the meat joint factory has an unshirkable responsibility for this incident Mr Xiao's request is that the meat joint factory should not only compensate for the corresponding medical expenses of the poisoned people, but also compensate for the lost work and nutrition expenses caused by their hospitalization according to the relevant regulations It is understood that after receiving the complaint, the Suzhou Consumer Association actively contacted the Suzhou health supervision institute and Suzhou meat joint factory, and together with Mr Xiao, the four parties negotiated to resolve the matter Mr Xiao said that under the mediation of the consumer association and the health supervision institute, the representatives of the meat joint factory at that time agreed to pay the medical expenses of the victims, but they did not accept Mr Xiao's demands for compensation for work delay and nutrition The reporter also confirmed from the municipal consumer association that the representative of the joint meat factory did admit that the factory had "part of the responsibility" at that time However, Mr Xiao thinks that it is not enough for the joint meat factory to only compensate for medical expenses He still insists that other losses caused by hospitalization should also be compensated according to relevant regulations The two sides have different opinions on this After that, Suzhou Consumer Association promised Mr Xiao to further mediate so as to reach a consensus acceptable to both sides But to Mr Xiao's surprise, by June 2 or so, what he was waiting for was an "unfortunate news": the Consumer Association told him that now the joint meat factory not only still does not agree to pay the overtime fee, but also does not recognize the original recognized medical fee! Mr Xiao was greatly annoyed by the news, and thought that the joint meat factory had no sincerity in handling the incident, and tried to delay time in order to shirk its responsibility And Suzhou meat joint factory believes that the meat joint factory should not be responsible for the "Clenbuterol poisoning" incident, and the factory has never acknowledged the responsibility Because the meat joint factory only processes the slaughtered pigs, which belongs to the circulation link Moreover, before, the lean meat concentrate was not a necessary item for the detection of meat products, and the meat joint factory could not find the lean meat concentrate content in pigs and viscera in time, which would threaten human health In addition, Suzhou meat joint factory also believes that there is not enough evidence to prove that the pig liver that causes clenbuterol poisoning flows into the market from the meat joint factory, and it is unfair to point the finger at the factory Relevant people of Suzhou Consumer Association pointed out that now the meat union factory insists that it has no responsibility and is unwilling to make corresponding compensation to the consumers, and the consumer association is unable to do anything about it, so it can only recommend consumers to protect their legitimate rights and interests through legal channels In addition, it is learned from Suzhou consumer association that, in addition to Mr Xiao, there are seven other people in Suzhou who have complained and claimed for clenbuterol poisoning from Suzhou health supervision institute Since the supervision institute is not the organization to solve such disputes, the Institute has transferred the materials to the Consumer Association In this way, together with Mr Xiao and other three people who directly reported the situation to the Consumer Association, there are more than 10 people in Suzhou who have made "claims" for "Clenbuterol poisoning".